The intolerant left's jihad against Carrie Prejean continues

The jihad against Miss California, Carrie Prejean, by the hate-filled-frothing-at-the-mouth al Qaeda types who speak for and represent the entire left is at it again. First they released a semi-nude photo of Ms. Prejean on May 5th. Today they have decided to roll out another. This one's no worse then the first. Exact same pose except she's looking over her left shoulder instead of her right. All this time and effort to humiliate and destroy somebody over their belief in "traditional marriage" between a man and a woman. All this hate and vindictiveness coming from the left simply because she gave an honest answer to a question given to her by an angry, militant, fascist, Christian-hating gay activist. All this hate coming from a group of individuals who come from a political ideology that professes caring, love, tolerance, inclusiveness, hope and change. That is until you say something that they don't agree with. Then their going to open up the gates of hell and release the full force of destruction upon you.

Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy

I just wonder where President Obama stands on this matter. Does he support Ms. Prejean, who expressed the exact same view on marriage that he did, or does he side with those on his side of the political fence who are trying to destroy her. I would love for some White House correspondent to pose that question to him.

Is Ms. Prejean wrong for having semi-nude photos taken of her while professing to be a Christian? Yes. Was Ms. Prejean wrong for not being completely honest about these pictures when asked? Again, Yes. Is it right to go about and try to completely destroy her because of it? NO! Let's be honest about something here. Perez Hilton had an agenda against Carrie Prejean. He researched her and what he found out about her in his research he did not like. He knew from the get-go that she attended a Bible College and that she had Evangelical Christian beliefs. Therefore he set out to ask her a question in which to trap her. If she answered his question the way she did, he was going to destroy her as an anti-gay hating bigot. If she answered the question the way he claims she should have answered it, then he was going to set about destroying her as a hypocritical liar. So no matter how she answered his question, she was doomed.

As Gay Issues Arise, Obama Is Pressed to Engage (NY Times)

UPDATE: Here's TMZ getting in on the act.