President Obama is already caught breaking his own "transparency" and "ethics" rules.
Vote!
2 hours ago
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
GO NAVY!
Asian Babe of the Week
Celebrating the beauty of Asian women
You bet I do
Speaking truth to power
The no Ogasm zone
Support our Troops
About Me
- stormin
- Retired Navy Chief (4 yrs. active and 20 yrs. reserve), married twice (one American and one Thai), no children. Love asian women.
Twitter Me
My Right-Minded Friends
-
-
-
Constitution Roundtable1 year ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Last Call!9 years ago
-
-
Wednesday Hero - Admiral Oscar Badger II10 years ago
-
• THE JIMMY Z WEDNESDAY SHOW™10 years ago
-
Putting Life In Perspective11 years ago
-
-
A Letter to the Editor14 years ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
FuelMyBlog
7 comments:
Lindsey Graham said that this is ok because the guy is qualified.
So we suspend Presidential orders if the candidate is qulified, we suspend our tax laws if the guy is qualified, we suspend ethics rules if the woman (hillary) is qualified.
Two things.
1) Don't the Dims have anyone qualified that does not need a special exemption?
2) I hope "Republicans" like Graham and McCain don't hurt their backs bending over and grabbing their ankles for Obama.
@ Chuck ... it is sickening, isn't it. we have no party at the moment.
Breaking the rules....that damn Obama....next he will authirze torture. That son bitch. Where Bush when we need him right? He always followed the rules. Damn Obama!!
@ Flavor C ... i'm a lot more comfortable with Bush torturing three scumbag terrorists in order to prevent another 9/11 then i am Obama putting babies who survive an abortion into a cold dark closet in order to die from exposure.
@Stormin
You mean just like how they were killed over the past eight years under the Bush administration right?
He opposed the bill because a neutrality clause was not added, not because he wanted this to happen to babies.
This "neutrality clause" read as follows: "Nothing in this section [that is, the entire bill] shall be construed to affirm, deny, expand, or contract any legal status or legal right applicable to any member of the species homo sapiens at any point prior to being ‘born alive’ as defined in this section." Obama said that such a clause prevented the federal law from conflicting with Roe v. Wade
This sounds just like that funding for the troops bill that Mccain kept attacking him on, when in reality it he wanted a timetable for withdraw added not that he wanted them to have no funding.
GOT MY BOXING GLOVES ON TODAY!!! :)
@ Flavor C ... i'm sorry, but i just can't understand any person who can allow a newborn baby to die in a cold dark room, completely unattended, for any reason whatsoever. and then try to complain that pouring a little water down the nose of a terrorist killer, not for pleasure but to actually save lives of innocent Americans, as a crime. i'm sorry, i just can't equate the two. as always thanks for the discourse.
I was never comparing the two. I would rather torture a terrorist myself before seeing a baby die in the conditions you linked to.
We just happened to roll over into the abortion subject after you brought it up.
Hey I found another conservative blogger who won't ban or cuss me out over everything. New Blogger....pretty cool guy. I'm Not Rush Limbaugh
Take Care Stormin!
Post a Comment